San Jose Mercury News: Ethics Policy


The San Jose Mercury News is committed to the highest ethical standards. To take pride in the work we do, we must do our work honestly.

Fairness and accuracy are among our core values. But perhaps nothing stands above the need for the newspaper to maintain and preserve its integrity. We cannot hold the people we cover to standards we do not meet ourselves. The public's trust in our work - our most important asset - depends on our meeting these high standards.

This document is meant to provide a set of guideposts. It examines the fundamental and often difficult questions staff members might confront in the course of carrying out our journalistic mission. No policy can forecast every possible conflict of interest or ethical quandary that an employee of the Mercury News might confront. But this policy is an attempt to provide boundaries and encourage employees to be aware that, as journalists, we must adhere to a code of conduct that is equal parts ethics and common sense.

An ethics policy should be a living document. The committee that drafted these guidelines anticipated that the Mercury News, on occasion, must revisit the important ethical issues of the day to ensure its ethics policy does not become obsolete or, worse, ignored. Therefore, these are broad outlines; the newspaper will establish a fair method of dealing with ethical questions.

The Mercury News first wrote an ethics policy in the 1980's. In 2001 the policy was revised to address three areas: financial holdings, freelancing and gifts. This revision addresses recent concerns over the transparency of our journalism: our use of bylines, credit lines, datelines, and unattributed sources.

(An important note: Our relationship to our parent company, Knight Ridder, is a special case and, therefore, outside the boundaries of this policy. It is unique among all possible relationships and we acknowledge that at the outset. For example, it is permissible to hold stock in Knight Ridder -- even if you're covering it or making decisions about play and placement.)


The Mercury News strives to operate with fairness, accuracy and independence.

It strives to be diligent in its pursuit of the truth without regard to special interest and with fairness toward all. Although the law does not require it, the Mercury News whenever possible seeks opposing views and solicits responses from those whose conduct is questioned in news stories.

Editors and reporters should make news decisions without regard to the connections or outside activities of editorial employees, the publisher or employees of any other department.


The business and commercial activities of newsroom employees and their families shall not influence news decisions. Employees shall not benefit financially from news decisions they make or information they obtain, nor shall they make news decisions with the intention of creating a financial gain or loss for someone else.

This means, for example, we should not own stock in individual companies or industries we cover or make news decisions about them as part of our regular assignment, regardless of where those companies are located. In other words, we don't own what we cover, and we don't cover what we own.

If you have questions about what poses a conflict of interest, or what is on your beat, or the appropriateness of holding a particular stock, it is your responsibility to ask for direction from your AME. In all cases, get a clear "yes or no" response before proceeding. If necessary, get a response in writing (such as an e-mail) before taking any action. This policy applies to stock no matter how it's acquired, including direct purchase, inheritance, and "friends and family" grants. If you don't receive a response within 48 hours, go to the Managing Editor.

In addition, the nature of certain jobs requires such broad decisions about, or coverage of, tech companies that it would be a conflict for the people holding those jobs to invest in any individual stock. Those jobs presenting an automatic conflict of interest include, but are not limited to, the Executive Editor, the Managing Editor, the Assistant Managing Editor/Business, the Executive Business Editor, editors who regularly make 1A decisions, the tech stock columnist and the gossip columnist. The same principle applies to other industries. For example, the television writer shouldn't own any Disney stock.

Shares in pooled investments such as mutual or index funds, or in an account you don't actively manage (i.e. a blind or family trust), are excluded.

Although staff members may work or operate a business in addition to their employment at the Mercury News, it shall not conflict with their journalistic duties or give the appearance of conflict. For example, an editor whose spouse or significant other is employed by an auto dealership should not make decisions about that dealer or its competitors. Or, a staff member whose family owns several buildings in downtown San Jose should avoid redevelopment stories that could affect that area.

Even those staffers not involved in news decisions are reminded that information often available in the newsroom is in advance of public announcement and should not be used to make financial decisions.

In general, employees should avoid any potential conflict of interest between their financial holdings and their jobs. If for any reason you are asked to report or make key decisions about a story concerning a company in which you have a financial interest, this interest shall be fully disclosed to your AME. If a significant assignment is undertaken, you may not buy or sell securities of the company, or the industry of which it is a part, before the story's publication date.

This policy isn't meant to interfere with independent decision making by members of employees' families. The Mercury News recognizes that compensation in Silicon Valley relies heavily on stock options. However, any attempt to evade the above guidelines by trading or holding securities in the names of family members or others will be treated as a breach of the policy(*).

(*) Adopted from the New York Times' ethics policy.

The ethics policy should be read by all employees annually, and prospective and new employees will receive this policy. All employees will be held responsible for adhering to this policy.


Freelancing by staff members is permissible, with some restrictions. This policy provides guidelines for what staff members can do without permission, what they need permission to do, and what they cannot do. We want to avoid conflicts of interest and to protect the paper's integrity, while acknowledging that staff members sometimes supplement their incomes by freelancing on their own time.

Mercury News staffers may not work for media that are in direct competition with the paper. Direct competition is defined as daily and weekly newspapers that originate in seven adjoining Bay Area counties (Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Monterey, San Benito, Alameda, San Mateo and San Francisco.) The Wall Street Journal, the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times are also considered direct competitors, as are Web sites that are focused primarily on Silicon Valley or technology. The same is true of local radio and television programs that target our core content. Any exceptions must be made by the Managing Editor.

We use "freelance" as a broad term, to include text, photos, graphics, illustrations, and copy editing. (Similarly, when we say that staff members may not work for organizations or companies they cover, we use "cover" to include writing, editing, photography, illustration or page design. We say this because any facet of coverage could be compromised in a way that could favor an organization.) The umbrella extends overall.

As Mercury News employees, our first obligation is to the newspaper.

Freelancing for magazines that originate in the Bay Area (such as Sunset and San Francisco Magazine) is permitted after possibilities for publication in the Mercury News have been explored, and their immediate supervisor has been notified of the assignment.

Immediate supervisors will be notified when a staffer intends to use the Mercury News for identification purposes in freelance work for publications that are not in direct competition with the Mercury News. This policy is consistent with the Guild contract currently in place.

Mercury News staffers must not scoop the paper. Breaking news, enterprise stories and noteworthy items about the people you cover should be reserved for the paper.

Information that appears first in the Mercury News may be recast to appear in a national publication. (For example, Steve Young suffers a concussion. A Mercury News beat writer gives the paper exhaustive coverage. He then writes a piece for Sports Illustrated based on his reporting.) The writer will be identified as a Mercury News staffer whenever possible.


When freelancing for a print publication, it is important to not allow the publisher to automatically claim online rights. There are cases where a print publication does not compete with the paper, but the publication's online site does. Check with a supervisor before granting online rights.

Generally, freelancing for online sites shall follow the guidelines for print. However, online is developing so rapidly and business alliances are so fluid, it is difficult to draw a definite line between what Mercury News staffers can and cannot do.

Because the "Friend or Foe" distinction is often blurred online, freelance decisions are best made on a case-by-case basis. For example, in most cases a cross-link can be established from a competing site to ("Mark Schwanhausser covers Personal Finance for the San Jose Mercury News. For more of the Mercury News' award-winning business coverage, go to ...") The value in spreading the word about the paper may override the fact that the site competes with

In general, staffers will need to notify a supervisor to freelance for online publications that compete directly with the Mercury News or Knight Ridder digital sites. When making "Yes or No" decisions, supervisors must take the marketplace into consideration. (For example, if a staffer is offered $1,000 to do freelance work for an online site and Mercury Center can only offer $100, the supervisor must take the disparity in pay into account.)

When freelancing online, the staffer, when appropriate, is to be identified with the Mercury News. Whenever possible, a cross-link between the site and will be established.


Shows that are related to a staffer's area of expertise - in other words, shows where the appearance is generated by work that has appeared in the paper - require the approval of their immediate supervisor. The guest must be clearly identified as a staffer at the Mercury News. (Example: Sara Smith writes a column on children and health issues that appears on Tuesdays in the San Jose Mercury News.)

Staffers who appear as private citizens to discuss subjects not related to their work at the paper do not need the permission of a supervisor. (Example: An assistant features editor does not need permission to go on the air to discuss his opinions about U.S./China relations.) If the guest is to be identified as a Mercury News staffer, it must be clear that he or she is appearing as an individual and is not representing the paper.

Staff members shall demonstrate the same commitment to fairness and high standards of impartiality that they do in the newspaper.


Freelance PR assignments should always be discussed with a supervisor. Because the potential for conflict is high and often indirect, this practice is strongly discouraged. (The director of a PR firm may tell a client, "I've got an in at the Mercury News. John Doe is writing copy for us.")

Staffers must not accept freelance assignments from PR firms and marketing agencies that have a connection to the area they cover. No writer will do work for a PR journal that is connected to the area they cover. (Example: The medical writer cannot do PR for Schering-Plough Pharmaceutical, or for a Schering-Plough publication, no matter how closely it mimics a legitimate magazine.) Writers must not write for the publications of institutions they cover ... the business writer assigned to HP should not write for the HP in-house magazine; the writer who covers Stanford may not write for the Stanford alumni magazine.

Remember when freelancing for trade journals that breaking news belongs to the Mercury News.


Staffers who are freelancing for pay for sections of the Mercury News (Perspective, Books, Real Estate, etc.), should do so on their own time. Freelancing for a section should never conflict with daily assignments. Whenever possible, agreements on the use of a freelancer's time should be reached between the freelancer's supervisor and the editor of the other section.


Staffers may make reasonable use of company equipment or resources while freelancing for outside publications.

What is "reasonable?" Using a computer after work hours; doing a limited number of searches on Lexis-Nexis.

What is "not reasonable?" Using a company car to drive to and from a freelance assignment. Using the Mercury News photography lab to develop film shot for a freelance assignment. Using a Mercury News librarian to do research for a freelance assignment.

Since the cars assigned to photographers are for their personal as well as professional use, there is no conflict in a photographer using a company car to drive to cover a freelance assignment, just as there is no conflict in using the lab at the paper to develop film for a freelance assignment in a section of the Mercury News.


As a general rule, we pay our own way.

The Mercury News will pay for meals and drinks shared with news sources, for breakfasts, luncheons or dinners that are covered as news events and for restaurant meals reviewed. When the cost of a meal includes a sum tacked on to raise funds (for instance a $300-a-plate political dinner), we will pay only what we estimate to be the price of the meal if it were to be purchased in a restaurant. (This is not meant to prohibit corporate contributions to charity fund-raisers).

Whenever complimentary meals are supplied at press events, staff members should calculate about how much their portions cost and then reimburse the coordinator of the event. We realize that staff members may encounter situations in which it is socially awkward or even impossible to pay for a meal or entertainment. Obviously, common sense should prevail in such circumstances. Such situations, however, should be rare and should not be entered into habitually.

Take note: This policy lays out guidelines for how staff members should conduct themselves and is not meant as a replacement for solid professional judgment.

With regard to meals with news sources, it is acceptable to let a source pay for a meal as long as one expects to be able to return the favor and pick up the check sometime in the near future.

Staff members may accept free admission to plays, concerts and other performances and sporting events for the purpose of reviewing them or covering them for the Mercury News.

Otherwise, free tickets to sports events, movies, plays, fairs, amusement parks and all other entertainment for which admission is normally charged shall not be accepted or solicited. This is not meant to prohibit staff members from accepting tickets for free or at a discount through the Mercury News.

If the event being covered is a private screening or special press conference for which tickets are not being sold to the public, it is permissible to attend gratis. Similarly, in cases such as a business seminar or League of Cities meeting, a reporter covering the event may attend without paying the registration fee after receiving permission from a supervisor. Special press box facilities, photo galleries and passes to areas exclusive to the press are also accepted, provided these are used only for business reasons or by the persons assigned to cover the event. These press passes must never be given or sold to anyone.

Transportation and other expenses necessary for the performance of professional duties shall be paid by the Mercury News in all possible cases - including travel on the press plane of a political candidate or sports team. All special travel arrangements should be cleared by a supervisor. In extreme circumstances, a staff member trying to cover a story may accept transportation but should let a supervisor know about it at the earliest opportunity. Such a case might be when the only way available to a disaster site is by Army helicopter - and a decision on whether to board must be made on the spot.

Whenever possible the Mercury News shall not knowingly accept freelance work by writers who have accepted free travel or who have violated guidelines laid out in the Mercury News' ethics policy. All freelance writers should be given a copy of the newspaper's ethics policy and be required to sign a form indicating they have read and understand the guidelines.


Employees should not accept or solicit business-connected gifts or free services. Items received whose value is greater than $25 should be taken to a central location where they will be returned or donated to a charity. A letter explaining the paper's policy will be forwarded to the giver.

Items that are of token or insignificant value (under $25), such as calendars, pencils or key chains, may be accepted if returning them would be awkward. Bottles of liquor or wine shall be considered of more than token value and may not be kept. One exception: the wine critic who may use the products as part of a review.

Books, records, sample food products, software or other items sent to the Mercury News for review purposes are accepted as news releases. They may be kept by the person who reviews them or given to staff members who can use them as part of their job. Materials that are not distributed should be given to a charity or public institution. These items should never, under any circumstances, be sold for personal profit.

Props for photo illustrations shall be rented or purchased if possible. The Mercury News shall not request or accept free services or materials from professional models, stylists, etc., in return for photo credit.


When invited, Mercury News staff members should be permitted to speak before trade groups, community organizations, etc. However, staff members should not accept honorariums from groups that they regularly cover or that are related to their work.

In the event the invitation to speak requires travel or special accommodations, the paper should normally cover all reasonable costs for legitimate engagements. Instances where a staff member will be permitted to accept expenses as part of a speaking engagement will be decided on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the staff member's supervisor, using ethics -- not economics -- as the overriding factor. If a staff member does accept expenses, he or she will not cover the event as a story.

There is one exception: In the event the presentation is a professional seminar before a group of peers, staff members are permitted to accept expenses for travel.


Employees shall not use their positions with the Mercury News to get any benefit or advantage in commercial transactions or personal business for themselves, their families, friends or acquaintances.

For example, they shall not use company connections to:

  • Get information or a photograph for purposes other than those of the newspaper.
  • Expedite personal business with, or seek special consideration from, public officials or agencies, such as police.
  • Seek for personal use information not available to the general public.
  • Get free, or at a reduced rate not available to the general public, considerations such as tickets, memberships, hotel rooms or transportation.

Employees shall not use the company name, reputation, phone number or stationery to imply a threat of retaliation or pressure, to curry favor or to seek personal gain.

For example, it is improper for an employee to write a personal letter of complaint to a merchant on company stationery, or to arrange a personal purchase at wholesale or discount rates through the public relations office of a corporation.


Because the newspaper should be perceived as impartial, staff members should avoid outside activities that could conflict with their jobs. Under no circumstances should a general assignment reporter, for example, work for a political campaign, either for pay or as a volunteer because it could be interpreted by the public as Mercury News involvement in the campaign. Likewise, a drama critic should not serve as a fund-raiser for the San Jose Repertory Company because it might indicate a built-in bias on the part of the writer. In many cases, it would be a clear conflict to accept appointive office or run for elective office. In other cases, it may not be a conflict. For example, there would be no problem for most staff members in holding office as president of school PTA. But if the education reporter were to hold the same office, a conflict would be present. There is no desire to unduly restrict staff members' exercise of the rights and duties of citizenship. But we must recognize that the reputation of the Mercury News is important to us all, and that a full discussion of possible conflict is essential to avoiding public embarrassment.

Staff members should avoid advertising or blatantly espousing viewpoints on public issues while at work, such as wearing an anti-nuclear button while covering a rally. Reporters and editors should be aware that such blatant espousal casts doubt upon their impartiality. Staff members should also avoid signing petitions or otherwise identifying themselves with causes they are expected to cover.


Employees shall not write, photograph, illustrate or make news judgments about anyone related to them by blood or marriage, or with whom they have a close personal relationship. This does not apply to first-person stories or stories in which the relationships are clearly spelled out. Nor shall personal relationships within the newsroom affect news judgment.

For example, it is clearly a conflict to report on a public official with whom one is romantically involved.


Under ordinary circumstances, reporters or photographers ought to identify themselves to news sources. There might be times, however, when circumstances will dictate not identifying ourselves. Only the Executive Editor or Managing Editor may approve such exceptions.


Plagiarism exists in many forms, from the wholesale lifting of someone else's writing to the publication of a press release as news without attribution. The daily newspaper should be an original work. Do not borrow someone else's words without attribution.


Any attempt to pay for news or for access to news raises serious questions about the validity of the news and the motives of seller and buyer. Except in extraordinary circumstances - approved by the Executive Editor or, Managing Editor - we do not pay for news.


We will avoid the use of unnamed sources. We will make every attempt to get sources to speak on the record in every instance.

We will not allow the use of unnamed sources in the case of personal attacks and we will avoid letting them be the sole basis for any story.

In all cases, we will attempt to get independent, corroborating sources for every assertion in a story.

We will attribute information to unnamed sources only when news value warrants and it cannot be obtained any other way.

When a story arises where the reporter and editor together believe that the use of an unnamed source may be necessary, the following guidelines apply:

1. The editor and reporter need to ask each other: why does this person need to remain unnamed? There must be a thorough discussion between reporter and assigning editor of whether there is any other way to get the story and the ramifications of using the unnamed source, considering the option of not running the story at all if the source cannot be identified. We recognize that some people may be risking their livelihood by speaking out for a story and need to be protected.

2. If both reporter and editor agree that the use of an unnamed source is necessary, the source must be described in as much detail as possible to indicate the source's credibility. Simply attributing a comment to "a source" is inadequate.

We should try to be as specific as possible. We should use the source's job title or general job description or say how they know the information if possible. We should use the word "person'' or an equivalent rather than the word "source" in most cases; the word "source" is journalistic jargon and is vague. And we should be precise about the number of sources we have for any piece of information; saying "sources close to the investigation" when there is only one source is not acceptable.

Some examples of phrasing that works in describing an unnamed source: "a city employee" or "a person present at the meeting'' or "a university administrator" or "someone who has seen the affidavit."

3. While it is important to protect the identity of our unnamed sources, we should not mislead our readers in order to provide this protection. So we should not say that a key source "could not be reached for comment" if we reached them and had a not-for-attribution interview. Likewise, if an unnamed source in a story is quoted on the record elsewhere in the same story, we should not allow the source to use the on-the-record quote to make contradictory assertions or distort the facts.

4. The reporter must identify the source to his or her editor and the editor must ask for the identity of any unnamed source used in the story. Editors who learn the identity of the source will be bound by the same confidentiality agreement reached between the reporter and the source, and the source's identity will not be made known to anyone outside of the Mercury News.

5. In cases where the assigning editor judges the story to be of great importance, of a highly sensitive nature or has any questions about using the unnamed source, that editor needs to bring the story to a department head for discussion and approval. In all cases where a story is based largely on unnamed sources, the matter should be discussed with a department head. Department heads should discuss any sensitive issues with their supervisors.

6. Every story that includes an unnamed source must include a notation indicating that the use of the source has been discussed with an assigning editor (Sources OK - Luis). In cases where the use of the source has been brought to the attention of a department head, there should also be a notation indicating the department head's approval (Sources OK - Elisabeth).

Wire stories: Carefully consider whether to allow the use of unnamed sources in stories produced by other newspapers or wire services, particularly from Washington, D.C., where the practice is common. Since we cannot check the credibility of unnamed sources in wire stories the way we can with staff-produced stories, the following guidelines should apply:

1. Wire stories should be held up to as many of the standards required of staff-produced stories as possible. These include not allowing the use of unnamed sources in the case of personal attacks and using unnamed sources only when news warrants and it cannot be obtained any other way.

2. Whenever possible, consult any in-house experts who may be knowledgeable on the topic discussed by an unnamed source.pic: does it ring true? Are any red flags raised?

3. Consider the source: is the news organization offering the story credible? Is the story on a topic on which that news organization would have expertise? You wouldn't expect Sports Illustrated to break a big story with unnamed sources on politics, for example.

4. Carefully examine how the story is written and any circumstantial evidence that would point to the story being true or not: does it all add up?

5. Spell out clearly in the wire story that the unnamed source is "an unnamed source in the Washington Post" so that readers are clear it is not a source of a reporter at the Mercury News.

6. In cases where there are significant conflicts between the attribution of information in the wire story and the Mercury News policy on unattributed sources, an effort should be made to contact the originating news agency for more information. This should be done especially when the information comes from another Knight Ridder newspaper.

7. Any doubts about the story, about questionable sourcing or insufficient attribution should be brought to the attention of an editor.


It is obvious that we should not knowingly publish falsehoods.

A reporter should not make it sound as if a source made a statement to the reporter if, in fact, it came to us through a third party. Nor should we write about an event we did not attend in a way that gives the impression we did.

In the interest of integrity and fairness, photographers and editors should exercise caution in the use of "set-up" photographs. In the same way that reporters do not make up quotes, photographers do not reconstruct scenes or events with the purpose of making them appear as if they were "found" moments.

However, photographers are often called upon to make environmental portraits or do illustrative photography. In no way should such photographs be approached or treated as anything but what they are. They are either portraits or are demonstrative of a situation. Both should be clearly labeled.

That means that care should be taken in writing captions so they do not suggest the picture is something it is not. For example, is Clark Kent working in his study or is he simply in his study (for purposes of a portrait)? Is Lois Lane actually practicing her technique of boomerang tossing or is she demonstrating her technique of boomerang tossing (for purposes of a photograph)? Such distinctions make a difference.


Any employee who is aware that another staff member has caused or intends to cause publication of a falsehood has a responsibility to alert a supervisor. Any employee who suspects a fellow staff member of committing ethical violations is encouraged to report the matter.



Quotations should always be the exact words that someone spoke, with the exception of corrections in the type of errors, as of grammar and syntax, that often occur unnoticed when someone is speaking but are embarrassing in print. In most cases, the grammar of people for whom English is a second language should be corrected as well. Spoken hesitancies such as um and ah should usually be omitted.

Parentheses within quotations are almost never appropriate and can almost always be avoided. Quotations are used to enliven and emphasize elements of a story, and internal explanations will often bog them down. If many parenthetical explanations are needed, the quote probably wasn't set up properly or wasn't a good quote to start with.

Avoid ellipses within quotations. While reporters often use ellipses in an attempt to remove extraneous elements, to readers they simply signal that we have altered the quotation and raise concerns that we may have changed its meaning in the process. Simply put: ellipses raise issues of credibility. We will, however, use ellipses to remove profanity from quotations.

How do we identify the manner in which quotes are received? Quotes obtained in a face-to-face conversation or over the phone need no special explanation. However, we generally should explain when a quote was received in some other way: via e-mail, in a prepared statement, in a televised press conference.

We should avoid the vague term "could not be reached for comment" in favor of phrasing more specific to the medium (by phone, e-mail, left message with assistant), time frame and number of attempts. For instance, instead of writing "Anita Roberts could not be reached for comment," we should say, "Anita Roberts did not respond to a message left with her assistant or to an e-mailed inquiry on Friday."

In cases where we conduct an interview through a translator, we should identify quotes received in that manner ("said through a translator"), as a signal to the reader that there are limits on our ability to attest to the accuracy of the information. In cases where the reporter does the translation, no special designation is necessary, unless the fact that the interviewee spoke in a foreign language is material to the story.


Bylines, datelines and credit lines should accurately convey to readers the source of our reporting.

Bylines tell readers who is responsible for an article's content while giving credit where credit is due.

When multiple bylines are proposed for an article, the editor should consider, did all reporters contribute significantly and more or less equally? If not, a credit line is more appropriate for lesser contributors.

In multiple bylines, the first name generally should be that of the reporter who wrote the article, or if different, of the largest contributor. This most directly tells readers who is responsible for the content.

In general, there should be a high threshold for bylines with three names, an even higher threshold for bylines with more. In those cases where one reporter has assembled the work of several others, the current Stylebook provision should be followed: "This report was written by Mary Doe of the Mercury News based on reporting by X, Y and Z."

When a reporter writes an article based on wire service reports, the source should be cited in the article and the article should carry the reporter's byline and a credit to the wire service. If the reporter independently reports the facts of the story, the byline can stand alone. If the reporter simply inserts some local reaction, or simply assembles the wire copy, the byline should be the originating source with a reporter's credit at the end.

If inserted wire material substantially becomes the top of a staff-written or KR story, or becomes the story's point, the byline should become a credit at the end.

Datelines: Our Stylebook is clear on the use of datelines - a dateline means that a reporter was there.

Credit lines: Don't use a credit line or tag line that says "From Mercury News wire services" if it's possible to list each source individually. Identify where the information came from, as in, "The Associated Press, the New York Times, Reuters and Mercury News staff writer Joe Shmo contributed to this report."

When adding a wire-service quote to a story, particularly if it is exclusive information or an anonymous quote, indicate the source: "Bush isn't going to run for re-election," a senior administration official told the Washington Post.

Revised style for credit lines are attached.


The Mercury News is sensitive to the privacy of victims of rape and child molestation, and of subjects who clearly would be in physical danger by publication of their names and addresses. There may be circumstances in which we would nevertheless publish such names, but they must be approved by the Executive Editor or Managing Editor.

Ordinarily, consent is implied if a photographer approaches a subject, indicates that he/she is a newspaper photographer and asks for names and other facts. In some circumstances, written releases may be required (at mental health institutions or orphanages, for example).


The Mercury News strives to guard against inaccuracies, carelessness, bias or distortion through either emphasis or omission.

Errors, whether made by the reporter, editor or source, shall be acknowledged. This includes all matters of fact, including the misspelling of proper names. When an error has been made, it shall be acknowledged in a straightforward correction, not disguised or glossed over in a follow-up story. Corrections and clarifications shall appear in a consistent location under the heading "Setting the Record Straight."


Photographs, stories, headlines or artwork shall not be submitted to, nor awards accepted from, contests sponsored by organizations or special-interest groups that we may normally cover.

Participating in such contests may create the appearance of conflict of interest or raise doubt about our ability to report fairly on that group or organization.

By the same token, materials shall not be submitted to, nor awards accepted from, contests where the entry will be used for the sole purpose of advertising or promotion.

However, contests that are judged by professional journalists or non-partisan experts are acceptable, even if sponsored by a commercial institution.